Branchoria Mythcraft Mythcraft

Clear evidence for why false beliefs spread and how better corrections work.

Within Mythcraft

Can You Protect People Before Myths Spread?

Prebunking teaches people the tricks behind misleading claims before they encounter a specific myth.

On this page

  • Inoculation as a metaphor
  • Common manipulation tactics
  • Where prebunking works best
Preview for Can You Protect People Before Myths Spread?

Introduction

Prebunking is the attempt to protect people before a misleading claim reaches them. Instead of waiting for a specific myth to spread and then correcting it, a prebunk warns people about the tricks that myths often use: emotional manipulation, fake experts, false dilemmas, conspiracy framing, scapegoating, decontextualised images, or attacks on trustworthy sources. The aim is not to make people cynical about everything, but to give them a small, memorable pattern-recognition tool before the next misleading post, advert, rumour or forwarded message appears.

Overview image for Prebunking This matters because misinformation often travels faster than corrections can catch up. A good prebunk works like a warning label for manipulation: “Here is the tactic you may see; here is how it works; here is what to check before you share.” Research on psychological inoculation, including large online experiments and field campaigns, suggests that this approach can improve people’s ability to recognise misleading techniques across different topics, though it is not a substitute for fact-checking, platform design, trusted journalism or public transparency. [Science]science.orgSciencePsychological inoculation improves resilience against…by J Roozenbeek · 2022 · Cited by 632 — We show that psychological inocul… [PMC]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govPMCPsychological Inoculation for Credibility Assessment, Sharing…by C Lu · 2023 · Cited by 125 — In this study, we conducted a meta-an…

Why prebunking uses inoculation as a metaphor

The most common explanation of prebunking comes from psychological inoculation theory. The metaphor is deliberately simple: just as a medical vaccine exposes the body to a weakened version of a threat so it can respond later, a misinformation inoculation exposes people to a weakened version of a manipulation tactic so they can recognise it when it appears in stronger form. In practice, this usually means two things: a warning that manipulation is possible, and a brief explanation or example of the tactic. [NCBI]ncbi.nlm.nih.govNCBIPrebunking Against Misinformation in the Modern Digital Ageby CS Traberg · 2023 · Cited by 38 — In recent years, research has shown t…

This is different from simply saying “do not believe false information”. A useful prebunk gives the reader a mental handle. For example, instead of predicting every false claim that might appear during an election, a prebunk might teach voters to watch for posts claiming that the election date has changed, that a polling place is closed, or that an image from another country proves something about a local candidate. It does not need to know every future rumour; it teaches the warning signs that make a rumour worth pausing over.

The inoculation metaphor also explains why timing matters. A correction after exposure has to compete with a story that may already feel familiar, emotionally satisfying or socially endorsed. A prebunk arrives before the misleading story becomes the default explanation. That makes it especially useful for predictable waves of misinformation: elections, health scares, natural disasters, migration debates, wars, climate events and moments when public uncertainty is high.

The metaphor has limits. People are not immune systems, and misinformation is not a virus in a literal sense. A single prebunk does not permanently immunise someone against all future deception. Effects can fade, messages can miss their audience, and hostile groups can adapt. The value of the metaphor is practical rather than magical: a small warning plus a clear example can make later manipulation feel less invisible.

The warning works best when it teaches the trick, not just the topic

A fact-based prebunk targets a likely false claim before it spreads. A tactic-based prebunk teaches a general manipulation method that can appear across many topics. Both can be useful, but they solve different problems.

A fact-based prebunk is strongest when a false claim is predictable. Election authorities, for example, can warn in advance that official polling dates, registration deadlines and vote-counting processes should be checked through named official channels. Public health bodies can warn before winter that misleading miracle-cure claims and fake screenshots of official advice tend to circulate during seasonal illness spikes. This kind of prebunk is narrow, but it can be powerful when the myth is expected.

A tactic-based prebunk is more portable. It teaches people to recognise the method behind a misleading claim, even when the subject changes. The practical guide developed by the University of Cambridge, BBC Media Action and Google’s Jigsaw describes prebunking as a way to build pre-emptive resilience against misleading and manipulative information, not merely as a one-off correction of a single rumour. [Prebunking]prebunking.withgoogle.comPrebunking MisinformationUNHCRPrebunking | UNHCR Information Integrity Toolkit10 Mar 2025 — Pre-bunking is a preventative measure that aims to prepare audiences t

[Common tactics include:]apnews.comAP News Google to expand misinformation 'prebunking' in EuropeAP News Google to expand misinformation 'prebunking' in Europe

  • Emotional manipulation: content that tries to provoke outrage, fear or disgust so strongly that the reader stops checking evidence.
  • Scapegoating: blaming a complex problem on a single group, often with little evidence and a strong invitation to resentment.
  • False dichotomy: pretending there are only two choices when the real situation has more possibilities.
  • Fake expertise: presenting someone as an authority without relevant qualifications, or using a fringe voice to imply a mainstream consensus.
  • Decontextualisation: using a real image, statistic or quote but stripping away time, place or surrounding facts.
  • Conspiracy framing: suggesting that lack of evidence is itself proof that powerful actors are hiding the truth.
  • Source discrediting: attacking journalists, scientists, election officials or public bodies in advance so that later evidence can be dismissed automatically.

This tactic-based focus is why prebunking fits naturally inside the wider subject of myths and misconceptions. Many myths survive not because every detail is persuasive, but because the format feels familiar: a villain, a hidden truth, a dramatic “they do not want you to know” frame, or a simple cause for a frightening event.

Prebunking illustration 1

What the evidence says prebunking can do

The strongest evidence for prebunking comes from controlled experiments and online field studies that test whether people become better at identifying manipulation or judging misinformation after a short intervention. A 2022 Science Advances study tested short inoculation videos about manipulation techniques and reported improved ability to spot misinformation techniques, including in a large YouTube field experiment run with millions of impressions. [Science]science.orgSciencePsychological inoculation improves resilience against…by J Roozenbeek · 2022 · Cited by 632 — We show that psychological inocul…

Game-based prebunking has also been studied. The online game Bad News asks players to take on the role of a misinformation producer, using tactics such as impersonation, polarisation and conspiracy-building. A cross-cultural study in Harvard Kennedy School’s Misinformation Review found that this kind of “weakened dose” exposure could reduce susceptibility to common misinformation strategies across several countries. [Misinformation Review]misinforeview.hks.harvard.eduMisinformation Review Prebunking interventions based on “inoculation” theory canMisinformation Review Prebunking interventions based on “inoculation” theory can

Meta-analytic work is broadly supportive but more cautious than campaign slogans sometimes suggest. A 2023 meta-analysis of psychological inoculation against misinformation reviewed 42 independent studies and found evidence that inoculation can improve credibility assessment and reduce willingness to share misinformation, while also noting variation by intervention type and outcome measured. [PMC]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govPMCPsychological Inoculation for Credibility Assessment, Sharing…by C Lu · 2023 · Cited by 125 — In this study, we conducted a meta-an…

More recent field research has tested whether prebunking can be embedded directly into social media feeds rather than delivered only in lab settings. A 2026 Instagram field study reported that users exposed to a brief emotional-manipulation prebunk were 21 percentage points better than controls at identifying manipulation in a headline, with effects persisting for five months, and were more likely to click through for additional information. [Misinformation Review]misinforeview.hks.harvard.eduMisinformation Review Prebunking interventions based on “inoculation” theory canMisinformation Review Prebunking interventions based on “inoculation” theory can

The important interpretation is modest but meaningful: prebunking can improve recognition of misleading techniques. It does not guarantee that people will reject every false claim, change their political identity, stop sharing all dubious content or trust every official source. Its clearest contribution is giving people a pause point before belief and sharing harden.

Where prebunking works best

Prebunking is most useful when the misleading pattern is foreseeable but the exact claim is not. This is why it often appears in election protection, public health communication, disaster response and platform safety campaigns. The intervention is well suited to moments when audiences are about to enter a noisy information environment and need fast heuristics for caution.

Google’s Jigsaw has used prebunking campaigns in several countries, including videos designed to teach manipulation techniques such as fearmongering, false comparisons, exaggeration, decontextualisation and scapegoating. Associated reporting on European campaigns notes that the approach is attractive partly because it can avoid arguing over every political claim while still teaching people how manipulation works. [AP News]apnews.comAP News Google to expand misinformation 'prebunking' in EuropeAP News Google to expand misinformation 'prebunking' in Europe

Humanitarian and public-interest organisations use similar logic. UNHCR’s information integrity toolkit describes prebunking as a preventative measure that prepares audiences to recognise and resist information risks, especially where reactive debunking can be overwhelmed by the speed of rumours, hate speech or crisis misinformation. [UNHCR]unhcr.orgUNHCRPrebunking | UNHCR Information Integrity Toolkit10 Mar 2025 — Pre-bunking is a preventative measure that aims to prepare audiences t…

Prebunking tends to work best when it is:

  • Timely: delivered before predictable misinformation waves, not months after interest has faded.
  • Specific enough to be memorable: “watch for decontextualised images after breaking news” is more useful than “be careful online”.
  • Non-patronising: people respond better to being equipped than scolded.
  • Locally credible: examples, language and messengers should fit the community.
  • Short and repeatable: a prebunk has to compete with the speed and simplicity of misinformation itself.
  • Paired with trusted routes to verification: warnings are stronger when people know where to check.

The practical challenge is that prebunking must be designed for attention-poor environments. A technically accurate but dull warning may fail where a misleading post succeeds because it is vivid, emotional and easy to share.

How "prebunking" misinformation works

Channel: 60 Minutes · Views: 31.2K · Uploaded: March 2024 · Length: 6 minutes

Open on YouTube

The best prebunks are clear, concrete and respectful

A strong prebunk usually has three parts: a warning, a weakened example and a practical response. The warning tells people that a manipulation tactic is common. The example shows the tactic in a low-stakes or fictionalised form. The response gives the reader something to do.

For example, a prebunk about decontextualised images might say: “After major breaking news, old images are often reposted as if they show the current event. Before sharing, check when the image first appeared, whether trusted outlets have verified it, and whether the caption matches the location.” This is more useful than “do not trust viral images”, because it preserves the reader’s agency and gives them a test.

A prebunk about emotional manipulation might say: “Posts that make you feel instant fury or panic may be trying to rush you past evidence. Strong emotion is not proof that a claim is false, but it is a reason to slow down.” The point is not to suppress emotion; many true injustices are emotionally powerful. The point is to notice when emotion is being used as a substitute for evidence. Research on social media prebunking has specifically focused on emotional manipulation because misinformation often exploits outrage and other negative emotions to steer attention away from facts. [Misinformation Review]misinforeview.hks.harvard.eduMisinformation Review Prebunking interventions based on “inoculation” theory canMisinformation Review Prebunking interventions based on “inoculation” theory can

A prebunk about fake experts might say: “A person can be confident, popular or credentialled in one area without being a reliable authority on this subject. Check whether their expertise matches the claim.” That warning can travel across health myths, climate misconceptions, financial rumours and political hoaxes.

The tone matters. If prebunking sounds like “only foolish people fall for this”, it can trigger defensiveness. If it sounds like “these tricks are designed to catch all of us when we are busy, angry or uncertain”, it is more likely to feel useful.

Prebunking is not the same as debunking

Debunking corrects a false claim after it appears. Prebunking warns about a claim, source or tactic before exposure. They are often presented as rivals, but they are better understood as complementary tools.

Debunking is necessary when a specific falsehood is already circulating: a fake public-health notice, a false election date, a fabricated quote, a misleading image from another event. It can supply the missing facts and reduce the continued influence of the false claim. Prebunking is useful when the next falsehood is predictable only in shape: the rumour will use fear, fake authority, scapegoating or manipulated context, but the exact wording is not yet known.

Evidence does not support the simplistic idea that one approach always beats the other. A European Commission Joint Research Centre summary of a Nature study reported that both prebunking and debunking reduced agreement with false claims, perceived credibility and likelihood of sharing misinformation in tested areas such as climate change and COVID-19 vaccines. [Joint Research Centre]joint-research-centre.ec.europa.euSource details in endnotes.

A 2026 set of experiments comparing fact-based prebunking and debunking found that debunking consistently reduced trust in disinformation over at least two weeks, while prebunking produced durable benefits mainly when people evaluated the corrected disinformation soon afterwards. The same work reported no significant backfire effects across ideological groups, which is important because fear of “making things worse” has sometimes discouraged corrections. [Sage Journals]journals.sagepub.comSource details in endnotes.

The practical lesson is not “prebunk instead of debunk”. It is: use prebunking to prepare people before predictable manipulation, and use debunking to correct concrete falsehoods once they appear.

Prebunking illustration 2

Policy choices: who should prebunk, and where?

As a policy intervention, prebunking sits between media literacy, public communication and platform governance. It can be delivered by schools, election bodies, public-health agencies, newsrooms, humanitarian organisations, civil society groups, social platforms or trusted local messengers. Each has advantages and risks.

Government bodies may have the reach and responsibility to warn about election procedures, public-health frauds or emergency rumours. But if trust in government is low, a government-branded prebunk may be dismissed by the very audiences it needs to reach. Newsrooms and fact-checkers may be trusted by some audiences but distrusted by others. Platforms can deliver prebunks at scale, but their role raises questions about transparency, accountability and whether brief safety messages compensate for recommendation systems that reward sensational content.

International policy organisations tend to frame prebunking as one part of a wider information-integrity approach. The OECD argues that media and information literacy should form part of a broader effort to reinforce information integrity, including understanding digital platforms, recommendation systems and generative AI. [OECD]oecd.orgOpen source on oecd.org. UNESCO similarly presents media and information literacy as a first line of defence against disinformation because it helps people become more critical users and producers of information. [UNESCO]unesco.orgOpen source on unesco.org.

Implementation therefore depends on matching the messenger to the risk:

  • Election offices are best placed to prebunk procedural rumours about voting dates, registration, postal ballots and counting.
  • Public-health agencies are best placed to prebunk fake guidance, miracle cures and impersonated official notices.
  • Schools and libraries can teach tactic recognition as a durable civic skill.
  • Newsrooms and fact-checkers can prebunk likely rumours before major events.
  • Platforms can test short, scalable interventions in feeds, adverts, prompts and creator tools.
  • Community organisations can adapt warnings for local languages, concerns and trusted channels.

The most credible programmes avoid pretending that prebunking alone can fix a polluted information environment. It is a resilience measure, not a full governance model.

Sander van der Linden: Psychological inoculation against misinformation

Channel: Trinity College, Cambridge · Views: 3.2K · Uploaded: March 2023 · Length: 47 minutes

Open on YouTube

Failure modes: when warnings can misfire or fade

Prebunking can fail when it is too vague. “Think before you share” is sound advice, but it gives people little help when they are facing a convincing screenshot or an emotional personal story. A warning needs enough detail to be usable.

It can also fail when it arrives too early or too late. If a warning is delivered long before the relevant misinformation appears, people may forget it. If it arrives after the myth has already spread, it may function more like a debunk and face the usual problem of correcting established impressions. Some evidence suggests timing and proximity to later exposure can shape whether prebunking effects endure. [Sage Journals]journals.sagepub.comSource details in endnotes.

Another risk is overgeneralised scepticism. A badly designed prebunk can teach people to distrust all sources rather than recognise specific manipulation. That may be especially harmful in crises, where people need reliable instructions quickly. Effective prebunking should distinguish between healthy caution and blanket cynicism: “check whether this image is old” is better than “you cannot trust any images”.

There is also an adaptation problem. Once manipulators know which tactics are being highlighted, they may shift style, use irony, hide behind humour, flood audiences with competing claims, or attack the prebunk itself as propaganda. This does not make prebunking useless, but it means interventions need updating, testing and local feedback rather than being treated as one-off campaigns.

Finally, prebunking may not reach the people most likely to encounter a particular myth. Social media adverts, classroom lessons and official websites all reach different audiences. A campaign that works in one country, language or platform may not transfer cleanly to another.

Fighting misinformation online: pre-bunking workshop

Channel: International Journalism Festival · Views: 136 · Uploaded: April 2023 · Length: 49 minutes

Open on YouTube

What a good prebunk changes for the reader

The best outcome of prebunking is not that a person memorises a list of myths. It is that they recognise a familiar trick at the right moment.

Before prebunking, a reader may see an alarming post and ask, “Is this shocking claim true?” After a good prebunk, they may ask a better first question: “Is this trying to rush me with fear, blame or fake authority before I check?” That shift matters because myths and misconceptions often rely on speed. They want the share, the emotional reaction, the group signal or the first impression before verification begins.

A reader who has been prebunked should be able to pause at a few common signals:

  • A claim asks for immediate sharing before evidence is available.
  • A post uses an image or quote without a clear date and source.
  • A complex problem is blamed entirely on one group.
  • A supposed expert’s credentials do not match the topic.
  • A headline offers only two extreme choices.
  • A source says all contrary evidence is part of the cover-up.
  • A message attacks the trustworthiness of future corrections before they appear.

That pause is the intervention. It does not require the reader to become a professional fact-checker. It simply interrupts the moment when a myth tries to become familiar, emotionally satisfying and socially contagious. For myths and misconceptions, that early interruption can be more valuable than a perfect correction delivered after the story has already taken root.

Prebunking illustration 3

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Can You Protect People Before Myths Spread?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Browse more on Amazon: Calling Bullshit Factfulness The Skeptics' to the Universe books

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Using USA
Browse more on eBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

  1. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10498317/
    Source snippet

    PMCPsychological Inoculation for Credibility Assessment, Sharing...by C Lu · 2023 · Cited by 125 — In this study, we conducted a meta-an...

  2. Source: unhcr.org
    Link: https://www.unhcr.org/handbooks/informationintegrity/practical-tools/prebunking
    Source snippet

    UNHCRPrebunking | UNHCR Information Integrity Toolkit10 Mar 2025 — Pre-bunking is a preventative measure that aims to prepare audiences t...

  3. Source: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK609022/
    Source snippet

    NCBIPrebunking Against Misinformation in the Modern Digital Ageby CS Traberg · 2023 · Cited by 38 — In recent years, research has shown t...

  4. Source: misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu
    Title: Misinformation Review Prebunking interventions based on “inoculation” theory can
    Link: https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/global-vaccination-badnews/

  5. Source: misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu
    Title: Misinformation Review Prebunking misinformation techniques in social media feeds
    Link: https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/prebunking-misinformation-techniques-in-social-media-feeds-results-from-an-instagram-field-study/

  6. Source: time.com
    Link: https://time.com/6970488/google-jigsaw-eu-elections-misinformation-prebunking/

  7. Source: oecd.org
    Link: https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/disinformation-and-misinformation.html

  8. Source: unesco.org
    Link: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/media-and-information-literacy-first-line-defence-against-disinformation

  9. Source: oecd.org
    Link: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/policy-responses-to-false-and-misleading-digital-content_1104143e-en.html

  10. Source: oecd.org
    Title: 1104143e en
    Link: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2022/08/policy-responses-to-false-and-misleading-digital-content_598ca9a6/1104143e-en.pdf

  11. Source: oecd.org
    Link: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2020/08/governance-responses-to-disinformation_6285c78a/d6237c85-en.pdf

  12. Source: unesco.org
    Link: https://www.unesco.org/en/publication/action-plan-combatting-disinformation-and-misinformation-through-media-and-information-literacy-mil

  13. Source: unesco.org
    Link: https://www.unesco.org/mil4teachers/en/node/163

  14. Source: youtube.com
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/%40infointerventions

  15. Source: youtube.com
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0rsAMywBio

  16. Source: cambridge.org
    Link: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/psychology-of-misinformation/interventions-to-combat-misinformation/FCD74AF8BD30397DCF5A244DB55172A4

  17. Source: misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu
    Title: FORMATTED globalvaccination Jan30
    Link: https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/FORMATTED_globalvaccination_Jan30.pdf

  18. Source: nature.com
    Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-022-01713-6

  19. Source: youtube.com
    Title: How “prebunking” misinformation works
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RmxeZHPeHg
    Source snippet

    Sander van der Linden: Psychological inoculation against misinformation...

  20. Source: youtube.com
    Title: Sander van der Linden: Psychological inoculation against misinformation
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ2l48cNEJQ
    Source snippet

    University of Cambridge...

  21. Source: youtube.com
    Title: Prebunking: A new way to fight misinformation
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k5Xy48545A
    Source snippet

    Inoculation: How to spot misinformation...

  22. Source: youtube.com
    Title: Inoculation: How to spot misinformation
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYv9y7qG0n0
    Source snippet

    Digital media literacy and prebunking explained...

  23. Source: youtube.com
    Title: Digital media literacy and prebunking explained
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3fT-h_1D64

  24. Source: science.org
    Link: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abo6254
    Source snippet

    SciencePsychological inoculation improves resilience against...by J Roozenbeek · 2022 · Cited by 632 — We show that psychological inocul...

  25. Source: prebunking.withgoogle.com
    Title: Prebunking Misinformation
    Link: https://prebunking.withgoogle.com/docs/A_Practical_Guide_to_Prebunking_Misinformation.pdf

  26. Source: apnews.com
    Title: AP News Google to expand misinformation ‘prebunking’ in Europe
    Link: https://apnews.com/article/a10273eea5a0227c38187cc4f84d8788

  27. Source: joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu
    Link: https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/jrc-news-and-updates/misinformation-and-disinformation-both-prebunking-and-debunking-work-fighting-it-2024-10-25_en

  28. Source: journals.sagepub.com
    Link: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01461672251411571

  29. Source: prebunking.withgoogle.com
    Link: https://prebunking.withgoogle.com/resources/

  30. Source: prebunking.withgoogle.com
    Link: https://prebunking.withgoogle.com/

  31. Source: research.vu.nl
    Title: prebunking misinformation techniques in social media feeds result
    Link: https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/prebunking-misinformation-techniques-in-social-media-feeds-result/

  32. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/unesco/posts/-stop-the-spread-of-disinformation-verify-the-information-before-you-share-toget/794851252690425/

  33. Source: socialsciencespace.com
    Title: prebunking on youtube in the fight against misinformation
    Link: https://www.socialsciencespace.com/2022/09/prebunking-on-youtube-in-the-fight-against-misinformation/

  34. Source: sciencedirect.com
    Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581926001126

  35. Source: sciencedirect.com
    Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432825001780

  36. Source: sciencedirect.com
    Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004727272500043X

  37. Source: zotero.org
    Link: https://www.zotero.org/groups/2243448/library/collections/79LXN6W7/items/IAZ2FW7L

  38. Source: elgaronline.com
    Link: https://www.elgaronline.com/display/book/9781035301447/vol3.chapter75.pdf

Additional References

  1. Source: researchgate.net
    Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/400035452_Prebunking_misinformation_techniques_in_social_media_feeds_Results_from_an_Instagram_field_study

  2. Source: kar.kent.ac.uk
    Link: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/111049/9/British%20J%20of%20Psychology%20-%202025%20-%20Biddlestone%20-%20Fighting%20fire%20with%20fire%20%20Prebunking%20with%20the%20use%20of%20a%20plausible.pdf

  3. Source: netwerkmediawijsheid.nl
    Link: https://netwerkmediawijsheid.nl/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/D1.1-OMEDIA_Literature_Final.pdf

  4. Source: diplomacy.edu
    Link: https://www.diplomacy.edu/wp-content/uploads/DD-report.pdf

  5. Source: opengovpartnership.org
    Link: https://www.opengovpartnership.org/open-gov-guide/digital-governance-disinformation-and-information-integrity/

  6. Source: epc.eu
    Link: https://www.epc.eu/publication/From-debunking-to-prebunking-How-to-get-ahead-of-disinformation-on-mi-446f88/

  7. Source: stratcomcoe.org
    Link: https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/download/Inoculation-theory-and-Misinformation-FINAL-digital-ISBN-ebbe8.pdf

  8. Source: linkedin.com
    Link: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sander-van-der-linden-156a08203_new-real-world-field-study-on-psychological-activity-7420437881183428608-KxAM

  9. Source: linkedin.com
    Link: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sander-van-der-linden-156a08203_prebunking-inoculation-badnews-activity-7461018385804591104-p4Lt

  10. Source: acice-asean.org
    Link: https://www.acice-asean.org/files/information%20centre%20reports/jul_24_info.pdf

Topic Tree

Follow this branch

Parent topic

Mythcraft

Related pages 39

More on this topic 5