Within Mythcraft

Why Uncertainty Makes Myths Appealing

Myths often spread during uncertainty because they offer certainty, blame or a rule of thumb when people feel unsettled.

On this page

  • Anxiety and simple answers
  • Blame and control
  • Communicating uncertainty honestly
Preview for Why Uncertainty Makes Myths Appealing

Introduction

When people face uncertainty — whether about the future, social change, a crisis, or complex events — they often gravitate toward myths and simple narratives that promise clarity and emotional comfort. Psychological research shows that uncertainty is not just a cognitive gap; it triggers negative affective states such as anxiety and existential threat, which in turn make emotionally resonant myths more appealing and easier to accept. This dynamic helps explain why myths, conspiracy theories, and oversimplified explanations flourish in uncertain times: they offer emotional regulation, a sense of control, and an immediate narrative where ambiguity once was.

Overview image for Uncertainty

Anxiety, Uncertainty and the Emotional Drive for Closure

Uncertainty is intrinsically linked to negative emotional states such as anxiety, worry, fear and existential threat. People dislike ambiguity — it feels psychologically uncomfortable and can motivate efforts to reduce that discomfort. Research shows that individuals who are uncertainty‑averse and experience heightened anxiety are more likely to endorse beliefs that appear to eliminate ambiguity and provide coherent explanations, including conspiracy theories or paranormal beliefs that “fill in the blanks” of complex situations. These beliefs promise a clear cause and outcome, standing in stark contrast to ambiguity and threat. [PMC]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govThreat - PMCDecember 29, 2021…Published: December 29, 2021

This pattern aligns with broader findings in emotion‑uncertainty psychology: uncertainty tends to produce negative affective responses, and people often engage in mental simulation of worst‑case scenarios, further amplifying emotional discomfort. This creates a powerful drive for simplified narratives that promise consistency or certainty. [Frontiers]frontiersin.orgFrontiersFrontiers | The Relationship Between Uncertainty and AffectNovember 12, 2019…Published: November 12, 2019

Uncertainty illustration 1

How Uncertain Emotions Promote Myth Acceptance

Not all emotions operate alike. Distinctive research reveals that emotions characterised by uncertainty — worry, surprise, fear, and hope — differ from emotions that convey certainty, such as anger or happiness. When people feel emotions associated with uncertainty, they are motivated to restore a sense of order and reduce psychological ambiguity. Experimental psychology studies have shown that such uncertain emotional states increase compensatory efforts to impose structure on the world, which appears as stronger belief in conspiracies, the paranormal, or simplistic historical narratives. These effects occur even when the emotional valence (positive or negative) is held constant; it is the certainty associated with the emotion, not its pleasantness, that predicts greater myth acceptance. [ScienceDirect]sciencedirect.comScienceDirectThe emotional roots of conspiratorial perceptions, system justification, and belief in the paranormal - ScienceDirectJanuary…

Emotion, Narrative Simplicity and Cognitive Closure

Uncertain emotions also heighten the need for cognitive closure — the desire to reach a firm conclusion quickly and maintain it. In situations of complexity, ambiguity, or rapid change, people seek closure because ongoing uncertainty feels aversive. Myths and simplified explanations provide closure by offering clear causal stories and reducing the psychological discomfort associated with open‑ended questions. When uncertainty is made salient — for example during public health crises or political upheavals — the need for closure correlates with increased acceptance of conspiracy beliefs and other simplistic narratives because they reduce ambiguity and offer an emotional sense of mastery. [PMC]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govThreat - PMCDecember 29, 2021…Published: December 29, 2021

Uncertainty illustration 2

The Role of Emotional Processing in Evaluating Information

Beyond general emotional states, reliance on emotion over analytic reasoning affects myth acceptance directly. Research on fake news and misinformation shows that heightened emotionality makes people more susceptible to believing false information, even when they have the cognitive ability to evaluate evidence. Experimental evidence demonstrates that individuals who rely more on emotional gut reactions — rather than deliberative reasoning — show greater belief in false news and oversimplified explanations. This suggests that emotion and uncertainty interact not just at the level of feeling, but at the level of information processing, making emotionally charged narratives feel more credible under uncertainty. [SpringerLink]link.springer.comon emotion promotes belief in fake news | Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications | Springer Nature LinkOctober 7, 2020 — RELIANC…Published: October 7, 2020

Blame, Control and Emotional Compensation

In many uncertain contexts, myths offer not only narrative closure but also a locus of blame or control. When events are complex or ambiguous, assigning responsibility — even inaccurately — helps reduce the psychological distress associated with not knowing who or what is responsible. This emotional compensation can reinforce myth acceptance: beliefs that attribute causality to a specific agent (e.g., secret cabals, hidden forces) satisfy emotional needs for orderliness, control, and predictability, even if they distort reality. Although such attributions can be psychologically comforting, they often oversimplify complex systems and deflect attention from systemic causes that require more nuanced understanding.

Uncertainty illustration 3

Communicating Uncertainty Honestly to Reduce Emotional Drivers

Recognising the emotional mechanisms by which uncertainty fuels myth acceptance suggests pathways for reducing reliance on false narratives. Honest communication about uncertainty — where experts acknowledge complexity and explain the limits of current knowledge — can reduce the anxiety that motivates myth adherence. Studies on science communication and risk perception indicate that when communicators provide clear reasoning, contextualise uncertainty, and offer actionable guidance rather than vague reassurances, audiences can maintain trust without defaulting to oversimplified interpretations. Framing uncertainty as a normal and manageable part of complex issues, rather than something to be feared, helps mitigate the emotional impulse toward myths.

Summing Up

Uncertainty interacts with emotion to shape how people evaluate and accept myths. Negative affective responses to ambiguity — including anxiety, threat, and the aversion to mental irresolution — drive a psychological need for closure, blame, and control. These needs, in turn, make emotionally resonant myths and simplistic narratives especially appealing during uncertain times. Underlying this pattern is not only the content of the myth, but the emotional regulation function myths serve: reducing distress, offering narrative closure, and making sense of complexity. Acknowledging these emotional drivers is crucial for effective communication, education, and strategies to foster resilience against misinformation and unfounded beliefs.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Why Uncertainty Makes Myths Appealing. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Using USA

Endnotes

  1. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9896259/
    Source snippet

    Threat - PMCDecember 29, 2021...

    Published: December 29, 2021

  2. Source: sciencedirect.com
    Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103114001358
    Source snippet

    ScienceDirectThe emotional roots of conspiratorial perceptions, system justification, and belief in the paranormal - ScienceDirectJanuary...

  3. Source: sciencedirect.com
    Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103104000642
    Source snippet

    tions and bolstering of cultural worldviews - ScienceDirectJOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY Volume 41, Issue 2, March 2005, Page...

    Published: March 2005

  4. Source: sciencedirect.com
    Title: That’s interesting!
    Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563222004393
    Source snippet

    The role of epistemic emotions and perceived credibility in the relation between prior beliefs and susceptibility to fake-news - ScienceD...

  5. Source: sciencedirect.com
    Title: Better the devil you know than a world you don’t?
    Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886916303221
    Source snippet

    Intolerance of uncertainty and worldview explanations for belief in conspiracy theories - ScienceDirectPERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERE...

  6. Source: frontiersin.org
    Link: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02504/full
    Source snippet

    FrontiersFrontiers | The Relationship Between Uncertainty and AffectNovember 12, 2019...

    Published: November 12, 2019

  7. Source: cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com
    Link: https://cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3
    Source snippet

    SpringerLinkReliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news | Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications | Full TextOctober 7, 2020...

    Published: October 7, 2020

  8. Source: link.springer.com
    Link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3
    Source snippet

    on emotion promotes belief in fake news | Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications | Springer Nature LinkOctober 7, 2020 — RELIANC...

    Published: October 7, 2020

  9. Source: business.columbia.edu
    Title: emotional roots conspiratorial perceptions system justification and belief
    Link: https://business.columbia.edu/faculty/research/emotional-roots-conspiratorial-perceptions-system-justification-and-belief
    Source snippet

    emotional roots of conspiratorial perceptions, system justification, and belief in the paranormal | Columbia Business SchoolJanuary 1, 20...

Additional References

  1. Source: cambridge.org
    Link: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/4367D7DB6A2CDCEC9382E957B02A92A1
    Source snippet

    January 2, 2025 — A TERROR MANAGEMENT THEORY PERSPECTIVE ON THE APPEAL OF HISTORICAL MYTHS Published online by Cambridge University Press...

    Published: January 2, 2025

  2. Source: psychologicalscience.org
    Title: Awe, Uncertainty, and Agency Detection
    Link: https://www.psychologicalscience.org/journals/psychological-science/0956797613501884/
    Source snippet

    Psychological Science - APSPsychological Science AWE, UNCERTAINTY, AND AGENCY DETECTION Piercarlo Valdesolo, Jesse Graham Volume 25, Issu...

  3. Source: ovid.com
    Title: * Linton, Susan Author information * ^{1}Graduate School of Bus
    Link: https://www.ovid.com/journals/jpspy/abstract/00005205-200112000-00001~judgment-under-emotional-certainty-and-uncertainty-the
    Source snippet

    Judgment Under Emotional Certainty and Uncertainty: Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyDecember 1, 2001 — JUDGMENT UNDER EMOTIO...

    Published: December 1, 2001

  4. Source: tandfonline.com
    Title: Full article: Mistrust, uncertainty and health risks
    Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21582041.2020.1804070
    Source snippet

    BreakwellUniversity of Bath, Bath, UK Correspondence vcsgmb@bath.ac.uk [https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2002-5681](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2002-5681) Pages 504-516 | Received 08...

  5. Source: cambridge.org
    Title: Grüning [Opens in a new window] and Joachim I. Kr
    Link: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/2B51024AE3F7DA53358F73887FBD5445
    Source snippet

    Uncertainty reduction as an alternative explanation of historical myths | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | Cambridge CoreJanuary 2, 2025 —...

    Published: January 2, 2025

  6. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36224749/
    Source snippet

    Examining the Role of Uncertainty, Negative Emotions, and Perceived Relevance and Threat - PubMedOctober 12, 2022 —. 2023 Dec;38(14):309...

    Published: October 12, 2022

  7. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39743795/
    Source snippet

    2025 Jan 2:47:e189. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X2400061X. A TERROR MANAGEMENT THEORY PERSPECTIVE ON THE APPEAL OF HISTORICAL MYTHS Tom Pyszczyn...

  8. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/6861361/
    Source snippet

    2019 Nov 12;10:2504. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02504 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN UNCERTAINTY AND AFFECT Eric C Anderson ERIC C ANDERSON ^{1}Ce...

  9. Source: youtube.com
    Title: The Psychology of Uncertainty and Misinformation
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2_1835vj7Y
    Source snippet

    Psychology of uncertainty and conspiracy theories The Psychology of Conspiracy Theorists Psychology with Dr. Ana...

  10. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7539247/
    Source snippet

    2020 Oct 7;5:47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3 RELIANCE ON EMOTION PROMOTES BELIEF IN FAKE NEWS Cameron Martel CAMERON MARTEL ^{1}Sloan...

Topic Tree

Follow this branch

Parent topic

Mythcraft

Related pages 39

More on this topic 5